We asked a number of U of M students if they believed Americans should give up some of their civil liberties to increase national security. Here are their responses:
(Clockwise from top left)
“There’s a line that needs to be drawn.”
Blair Woodward, 20, broadcasting major
“I just don’t want them to listen to my phone conversations.”
Carrie Lepowitz, 27, non-degree seeking student
“I think it’s the point of liberty. Liberties aren’t rights. It’s a dynamic situation. It has to be give and take.”
James-Allen McPheeters 24, non-degree seeking student
“Yes. Sometimes things need to be sacrificed for the greater good.”
Nathan Robinson, 24, chemistry major
(Clockwise from top left)
“I don’t know about the phone tapping. I agree with safety measures in public places. I agree with anything to ensure public safety, but phone tapping is too much.”
Tanjay Mitchell, 25, health information management major
“No. There’s no guarantee to me that giving up my civil liberties is going to guarantee safety. I think you can increase security without violating civil liberties.”
Sydney Lynch, 21, communication major
“Our country is based on freedom. I think we should have a heightened sense of security, but we need to get back to normal and live our lives just a little more cautiously.”
Cullen Morgan, 23, broadcasting major
“Yes. I think your civil liberties aren’t as important as people’s safety. I would be happy to give up my civil liberties to protect me and my family.”
Todd Christian, 23, biology major
(from left)
“There are certain limitations. Everyone is entitled to their privacy. I think traveling security is OK, but as far as phone tapping, I think it’s too far-fetched. Everyone needs a personal life.”
Adriana Ballentine, 18, undecided major
“I would let them check my bags in airports, but as far as phone tapping goes, I don’t think so. When you open the door to censorship, what’s to stop them from taking the next step?”
Ted Beasley, 21, broadcasting major
